From 155a4d93bdea282dfb4d72f2a5d3f54e133e9ac0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Luigi Scarso Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2023 14:41:51 +0000 Subject: LuaTeX 1.17.0 . git-svn-id: svn://tug.org/texlive/trunk@66967 c570f23f-e606-0410-a88d-b1316a301751 --- Build/source/texk/web2c/luatexdir/tex/texnodes.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'Build/source/texk/web2c/luatexdir/tex') diff --git a/Build/source/texk/web2c/luatexdir/tex/texnodes.c b/Build/source/texk/web2c/luatexdir/tex/texnodes.c index 6e0ae1ff8dd..72f6716dd93 100644 --- a/Build/source/texk/web2c/luatexdir/tex/texnodes.c +++ b/Build/source/texk/web2c/luatexdir/tex/texnodes.c @@ -1203,7 +1203,7 @@ void l_set_whatsit_data(void) { the original one as a metatable. After some experiments (that also included timing) with these scenarios I decided that a deep copy made no sense, nor did nilling. In the end both the shallow copy and the metatable variant were - both ok, although the second ons is slower. The most important aspect to keep + both ok, although the second one is slower. The most important aspect to keep in mind is that references to other nodes in properties no longer can be valid for that copy. We could use two tables (one unique and one shared) or metatables but that only complicates matters. -- cgit v1.2.3