diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Master/texmf/doc/xindy/faq-4.html')
-rw-r--r-- | Master/texmf/doc/xindy/faq-4.html | 668 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 668 deletions
diff --git a/Master/texmf/doc/xindy/faq-4.html b/Master/texmf/doc/xindy/faq-4.html deleted file mode 100644 index 81052562f1d..00000000000 --- a/Master/texmf/doc/xindy/faq-4.html +++ /dev/null @@ -1,668 +0,0 @@ -<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2 Final//EN"> -<HTML> -<HEAD> - <META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="SGML-Tools 1.0.9"> - <TITLE>XINDY FAQ: Style Files</TITLE> - <LINK HREF="faq-3.html" REL=previous> - <LINK HREF="faq.html#toc4" REL=contents> -</HEAD> -<BODY> -Next -<A HREF="faq-3.html">Previous</A> -<A HREF="faq.html#toc4">Contents</A> -<HR> -<H2><A NAME="s4">4. Style Files</A></H2> - -<H2><A NAME="ss4.1">4.1 Eventually, I decided to write my first index style. How can I start?</A> -</H2> - -<P> -<P>Congratulations! You have made a good decision, indeed. -<P>For a first impression, how a style file can be written from scratch -reference the <EM>tutorial</EM> that comes with this distribution. It is -written as a guided step-by-step practicing exercise and you can learn -the basic concepts quite easily. -<P>Afterwards, the best starting point is to make a copy of the template -file that contains all the necessary commands that are needed to make -a <CODE>makeindex</CODE>-like index. You can find it in the subdirectory -<CODE>markup/tex</CODE> of the module library. Starting from this template -you can remove or add commands as necessary. -<P>Additionally, consult the library of predefined <EM>index style -modules</EM> that comes with this distribution. Solutions for most of the -typical problems can be found there, such as a module for doing -case-insensitive sorting rules, or a typical TeX-like markup. Most -of the time is is enough to include some of these modules and add a -few additional commands. -<P>Maybe some of the examples coming with the <EM>test-suite</EM> are good -examples of how unusual index style files can be written. -<P>Thus, there are many ways to learn writing an index style file. But it -is very easy and after some experience you can process indexes your -friends will be jealous of. -<P> -<P> -<H2><A NAME="ss4.2">4.2 How to write my first index style?</A> -</H2> - -<P> -<P>Copy the file <CODE>tex/makeidx.xdy</CODE> from the library to your -local directory. It is documented in in a way that should make it easy -to fill in new commands or remove or modify others. -<P> -<P> -<P> -<H2><A NAME="ss4.3">4.3 How works the actual key feature of <CODE>makeindex</CODE> with <SF>xindy</SF>?</A> -</H2> - -<P> -<P>The treatment of the actual key (usually denoted with <CODE>@</CODE>, the -at-sign) has changed with <SF>xindy</SF>. Specifying index entries with a -specific markup can be done in <CODE>makeindex</CODE> with the actual key. The -<CODE>makeindex-3</CODE> system and <SF>xindy</SF> offer the <EM>merge-</EM> and -<EM>sort-rules</EM> to transform a key into different representations, -limiting the need to specify an actual key. For example they support a -style of writing -<P> -<BLOCKQUOTE><CODE> -<PRE> -\index{\bf{VIP}} -</PRE> -</CODE></BLOCKQUOTE> -<P>which can be transformed with a rule like -<P> -<BLOCKQUOTE><CODE> -<PRE> -(merge-rule "\bf{\(.*\)}" "\1" :again :bregexp) -</PRE> -</CODE></BLOCKQUOTE> -<P>which removes the macro definition for merging and sorting keywords, -but keeping the original definition for markup purposes. Therefore we -don't need any actual keys for all keywords written in boldface. -<P>The <CODE>makeindex</CODE> behaviour, that the two keywords -<P> -<BLOCKQUOTE><CODE> -<PRE> -\index{VIP} -\index{VIP@\bf{VIP}} -</PRE> -</CODE></BLOCKQUOTE> -<P>are seen as two distinct index entries, can be simulated using the -following definition: -<P> -<BLOCKQUOTE><CODE> -<PRE> -(merge-rule "\bf{\(.*\)}" "\1~e" :again :bregexp) -</PRE> -</CODE></BLOCKQUOTE> -<P>This rule tells <SF>xindy</SF> to remove the boldface macro for merging -and sorting purposes but defines the replacement to include the -special character <CODE>~e</CODE>, which is the last character in the -alphabet (ISO-Latin in our case). This makes <SF>xindy</SF> treat them as -different keywords and positions the boldface keyword right behind the -one without any markup. Thus we receive the following mapping: -<P> -<BLOCKQUOTE><CODE> -<PRE> -Keyword: Merged and sorted as: Appears in the index as: -VIP VIP VIP -\bf{VIP} VIP~e \bf{VIP} -</PRE> -</CODE></BLOCKQUOTE> -<P>With this new style of writing keywords and defining their markup, the -need to explicitly specifying the print key (aka. actual key) has -convinced us to remove the <CODE>makeindex</CODE> way of defining keywords. -<P> -<P> -<P> -<H2><A NAME="ss4.4">4.4 I want to process an index for my native language. What must I do?</A> -</H2> - -<P> -<P>What makes <CODE>makeindex</CODE> hardly usable in non-English speaking -countries is its lack of support of language specific alphabets and -sort orderings. For example, many roman languages such as Italian, -French, Portuguese or Spanish contain accented letters such as -À, Á, ñ. Other languages from northern Europe -have letters like Ä, Ø, æ or ß which often -can't even be processed by many index processors let alone sorting -them correctly into an index. -<P>Two problems must be solved when processing indexes with a new -languages: -<P> -<OL> -<LI> The <EM>sort ordering</EM> of the indexed terms must be specified -in an appropriate manner. This problem can be solved using the -so-called <EM>keyword mappings</EM>. -</LI> -<LI> The <EM>letter groups</EM> that partition the indexed terms into -separate sections must be specified.</LI> -</OL> -<P>The <SF>xindy</SF> system can be configured to process these alphabets by -defining <EM>sort</EM> and <EM>merge rules</EM> that allow expressing language -specific rules. -<P>The keyword mappings are as follows: The <EM>merge key</EM> is generated -from the <EM>main key</EM> with the so called <EM>merge mapping</EM>. The -merge mapping can be specified with the command <CODE>merge-rule</CODE>. The -<EM>sort key</EM> is derived from the merge key using the <EM>sort -mapping</EM> specified with the <CODE>sort-rule</CODE> command. The following -scheme shows this mapping process: -<P> -<FIGURE> -<EPS FILE="mappings.eps"> -<IMG SRC="mappings.gif"> -</FIGURE> -<P> -<P>The index style commands accomplishing this task are -<CODE>sort-rule</CODE> and <CODE>merge-rule</CODE>. One example of such a rule would -be -<P> -<BLOCKQUOTE><CODE> -<PRE> -(sort-rule "ä" "ae") -</PRE> -</CODE></BLOCKQUOTE> -<P>defining that a word containing the umlaut-a will be sorted as if it -contained the letters <CODE>ae</CODE> instead. This is one form of how the -umlaut-a (ä) is sorted into german indexes. With an appropriate set of -rules on can express the complete rules of a specific language. -<P>An example of how an appropriate mapping for some of the Roman -languages could look like is: -<P> -<BLOCKQUOTE><CODE> -<PRE> -(sort-rule "à" "a") -(sort-rule "á" "a") -(sort-rule "ã" "a") -(sort-rule "è" "e") -(sort-rule "é" "e") -(sort-rule "ç" "c") -</PRE> -</CODE></BLOCKQUOTE> -<P>This makes the accented letters be sorted as their unaccented -counterparts, yielding the desired sort ordering. -<P>Sometimes it is necessary to specify keyword mappings that tell the -system to put something <EM>behind</EM> something else. For instance, we'd -like to map the character <EM>ö</EM> behind the letter <EM>o</EM>. No problem -if you use the special characters <CODE>~b</CODE> and <CODE>~e</CODE> which -are called the <EM>beginning</EM> and <EM>ending</EM> characters. The first -letter lexicographically precedes all other letters whereas the latter -one comes after all others. Our mapping problem can now be specified -as follows. -<P> -<BLOCKQUOTE><CODE> -<PRE> -(sort-rule "ö" "o~e") -</PRE> -</CODE></BLOCKQUOTE> -<P>Now the <EM>ö</EM> is directly positioned after the <EM>o</EM> but before -<EM>p</EM>. -<P> -<P>See the manual for a detailed description of this feature. -Also be informed that the keyword mappings can be specified with -regular expressions. Rules of the form -<P> -<BLOCKQUOTE><CODE> -<PRE> -(merge-rule "[-$()]" "") -</PRE> -</CODE></BLOCKQUOTE> -<P>are possible. This on removes all letters of the defined letter class. -Regular expression substitutions are possible as well. Refer to the -manual for an exact description. -<P> -<P> -<P> -<H2><A NAME="ss4.5">4.5 In my index the capitalized words appear after the lowercase words. Why?</A> -</H2> - -<P> -<P>The default sort ordering sorts letters according to their ordinal -number in the ISO Latin alphabet. As a consequence the lowercase -letters appear before the uppercase letters. To sort them -case-insensitively use the command -<P> -<BLOCKQUOTE><CODE> -<PRE> -(require "lang/latin/caseisrt.xdy") -</PRE> -</CODE></BLOCKQUOTE> -<P>This module defines the appropriate sort rules for the letters `A-Z' -for latin-based alphabets. If your language has more letters simply -add the missing ones into your style file. Have a look at the module -to see how to the sort rules are defined. -<P> -<P> -<P> -<H2><A NAME="ss4.6">4.6 In my index there are no letter groups, yet!</A> -</H2> - -<P> -<P>Letter groups for latin based alphabets can be defined with the command -<P> -<BLOCKQUOTE><CODE> -<PRE> -(require "lang/latin/letgroup.xdy") -</PRE> -</CODE></BLOCKQUOTE> -<P>If your language needs additional letter groups you can insert them -into the previously defined letter group with inserting definitions of -the following form: -<P> -<BLOCKQUOTE><CODE> -<PRE> -(define-letter-group "ly" :after "l" :before "m") -(define-letter-group "ny" :after "n" :before "o") -</PRE> -</CODE></BLOCKQUOTE> -<P>This adds two more letter groups to the latin alphabet. Group <EM>ly</EM> -is inserted between <EM>l</EM> and <EM>m</EM>, and <EM>ny</EM> is inserted between -<EM>n</EM> and <EM>o</EM>. This is how two additional letters of the Hungarian -alphabet can be inserted. -<P> -<P> -<P> -<H2><A NAME="ss4.7">4.7 How can I get rid of any formatting information in the keyword?</A> -</H2> - -<P> -<P>Assume you have index entries containing arbitrary formatting -information. For example you write your index entries in TeX in the -following form: -<P> -<BLOCKQUOTE><CODE> -<PRE> -\index{\bf{In boldface please}} -</PRE> -</CODE></BLOCKQUOTE> -<P>To avoid specifying for each index entry the print key separately as -can be done with the following command -<P> -<BLOCKQUOTE><CODE> -<PRE> -\index{In boldface please@\bf{In boldface please}} -</PRE> -</CODE></BLOCKQUOTE> -<P>you can instead define a rule doing this task for you: -<P> -<BLOCKQUOTE><CODE> -<PRE> -(merge-rule "\\bf *{(.*)}" "\1" :eregexp :again) -</PRE> -</CODE></BLOCKQUOTE> -<P>This extended regular expression matches all strings that are -surrounded by this formatting command and in the <EM>merge phase</EM> the -formatting command is simply stripped off. Thus, you don't need to -write an explicit print key anymore. -<P>If for some reason the same word appears more than once in the index, -each time having another markup tag as in the following example -<P> -<BLOCKQUOTE><CODE> -<PRE> -index -{\tt index} -</PRE> -</CODE></BLOCKQUOTE> -<P>you must be warned that a rule like -<P> -<BLOCKQUOTE><CODE> -<PRE> -(merge-rule "{\\tt *(.*)}" "\1" :eregexp :again) -</PRE> -</CODE></BLOCKQUOTE> -<P>is probably not correct. In this case the above strings are both -mapped into the string <CODE>index</CODE> thus joining their location -references into one index entry. This happens because the result of -the merge mapping is used as the equality citerium which views both -keywords as equal. To avoid this you should specify instead -<P> -<BLOCKQUOTE><CODE> -<PRE> -(merge-rule "{\\tt *(.*)}" "\1~e" :eregexp :again) -</PRE> -</CODE></BLOCKQUOTE> -<P>With the additional meta character <CODE>~e</CODE> the substitution of the -second key word is placed <EM>after</EM> the first one making them -different index entries. If the second keyword should appear first, -use <CODE>~b</CODE> instead. -<P> -<P> -<P> -<P> -<H2><A NAME="ss4.8">4.8 In my index the word <EM>-foo</EM> appears before <EM>bar</EM>. What must I do?</A> -</H2> - -<P> -<P>Especially for hierarchical indexes sometimes the result is not as -expected due to special characters appearing in the keyword. In the -following example the word `card' should appear before `-eyed' since -the hyphen should not count as an ordinary character by means of -sorting. -<P> -<BLOCKQUOTE><CODE> -<PRE> - green - -eyed 12 - card 15 -</PRE> -</CODE></BLOCKQUOTE> -<P>This is especially problematic if the list of words on the second -level is very long. To make the hyphen be simply ignored during the -sorting process you should specify the following command in the index -style: -<P> -<BLOCKQUOTE><CODE> -<PRE> - (sort-rule "-" "") -</PRE> -</CODE></BLOCKQUOTE> -<P>This makes `-eyed' be sorted as `eyed' thus making it appear -<EM>after</EM> `card' as desired. -<P> -<P> -<P> -<P> -<H2><A NAME="ss4.9">4.9 I want to use letter ordering instead of word ordering in my index.</A> -</H2> - -<P> -<P>According to the <EM>Chicago Manual of Style</EM> there exist two -different schemes of sorting word lists. In <EM>word ordering</EM> -a blank precedes any letter in the alphabet, whereas in <EM>letter -ordering</EM> it does not count at all. The following example borrowed -from the <CODE>makeindex</CODE> man-page illustrates the difference: -<P> -<BLOCKQUOTE><CODE> -<PRE> - Word Order: Letter Order: - sea lion seal - seal sea lion -</PRE> -</CODE></BLOCKQUOTE> -<P>By default, <SF>xindy</SF> uses word ordering. To use letter ordering -include the appropriate module with the following command: -<P> -<BLOCKQUOTE><CODE> -<PRE> -(require "ord/letorder.xdy") -</PRE> -</CODE></BLOCKQUOTE> -<P>It actually defines the following command: -<P> -<BLOCKQUOTE><CODE> -<PRE> -(sort-rule " " "") -</PRE> -</CODE></BLOCKQUOTE> -<P>This simply removes all blanks from the keyword resulting in the -desired behaviour. -<P> -<P> -<P> -<P> -<H2><A NAME="ss4.10">4.10 My document does not have page numbers, but a different scheme. What must I do?</A> -</H2> - -<P> -<P>The ability to deal with user-definable location structures is one of -the most important new features of <SF>xindy</SF>. Many documents have a -document structure that is not based on page numbers. Typical examples -are manuals or appendices that come with a -<EM>chapter/page-per-chapter</EM> numbering scheme, URLs, Bible verses, -etc. One can even imagine the Greek alphabet as possibly appearing in -a location reference. In our analysis we have found many interesting -examples of location references that made us to develop the concept of -<EM>location classes</EM>. -<P>A location class is defined by a sequence of alphabets. An alphabet -can be the set of arabic numbers (0, 1, 2, ...) or the roman numerals -(i, ii, iii, ...). These are built-in alphabets in <SF>xindy</SF>. -Addtionally, one can define more alphabets in the index style with a -command like -<P> -<PRE> - (define-alphabet "weekdays" - ("mon" "tue" "wed" "thu" "fri" "sat" "sun")) -</PRE> -<P>Based on alphabets one can now compose a location class as follows: -<P> -<PRE> - (define-location-class "weekday-hours" - ("weekday" :sep ":" "arabic-numbers")) -</PRE> -<P>This class description indicates that all location refernces matching -this template are viewed as correct instances of this class. Here -<CODE>:sep</CODE> makes the dot serving as a <EM>separation string</EM> separation -the alphabets from each other. Example instances of this class are: -<P> -<PRE> -mon:23, thu:45, sun:17 -</PRE> -<P>For more detailed information consult the description of the command -<CODE>define-location-class</CODE> in the reference manual. -<P> -<P> -<P> -<H2><A NAME="ss4.11">4.11 I don't want to have ranges in my index. What can I do?</A> -</H2> - -<P> -<P>By default, <SF>xindy</SF> joins three successive location references into a -<EM>range</EM>. Ranges are used as an abbrevation for a long sequence of -location references. For exmaple the sequence -<P> -<PRE> -12, 13, 14, 15, 16 -</PRE> -<P>would be shorter represented as -<P> -<PRE> -12-16 -</PRE> -<P>If you don't want to have ranges, simply define your location class in -the form -<P> -<PRE> - (define-location-class ... :min-range-length none) -</PRE> -<P>The argument <CODE>:min-range-length none</CODE> avoids forming of ranges. -Arbitrary numbers instead of <CODE>none</CODE> define the minimum length of a -sequence of location references that are needed to form a range. -<SF>xindy</SF>s default value is 2. -<P> -<P> -<P> -<H2><A NAME="ss4.12">4.12 I want to markup ranges of different length differently. How do I accomplish this?</A> -</H2> - -<P> -<P>A common way of tagging ranges is as follows: a range of length 1 is -printed with the starting page number and the suffix `f.', those of -length 2 with suffix `ff.', and all others in the form `<EM>X--Y</EM>'. -<P>Assume we want to do this for the location class <EM>pagenums</EM> we can -specify the markup as follows: -<P> -<BLOCKQUOTE><CODE> -<PRE> -(markup-range :class "pagenums" :close "f." :length 1 :ignore-end) -(markup-range :class "pagenums" :close "ff." :length 2 :ignore-end) -(markup-range :class "pagenums" :sep "--") -</PRE> -</CODE></BLOCKQUOTE> -<P>The first command indicates that a range <EM>(X,Y)</EM> of length 1 should -be printed in the form <EM>Xf.</EM>, a range of length 2 as <EM>Xff.</EM> and -all others in the form <EM>X--Y</EM>. The switch <CODE>:ignore-end</CODE> causes -the end of range location reference Y to be suppressed in the -resulting output. -<P> -<P> -<H2><A NAME="ss4.13">4.13 I need to suppress some of the markup tags. How can I do this?</A> -</H2> - -<P>Sometimes it is necessary to hide some of the parts of the index. If -you have a text formatter that allows comments or macros that possibly -expand to nothing, just define appropriate markup that makes things -invisible to the formatter. For example, with TeX you can define a -macro like this -<P> -<BLOCKQUOTE><CODE> -<PRE> -\def\ignore#1{} -</PRE> -</CODE></BLOCKQUOTE> -<P>If you additionally define markup like this -<P> -<BLOCKQUOTE><CODE> -<PRE> -(markup-index :open "\ignore{" :close "}") -</PRE> -</CODE></BLOCKQUOTE> -<P>you can throw away the complete index if you like, which would be a -real pity! -<P> -<P> -<P> -<H2><A NAME="ss4.14">4.14 Whats it all about those cross references?</A> -</H2> - -<P> -<P>Cross references are references pointing to an item in the index -itself. Typical examples are: -<P> -<BLOCKQUOTE><CODE> -foo-bar <EM>see</EM> baz -</CODE></BLOCKQUOTE> -<P>With <CODE>makeindex</CODE> cross references could be specified with the -encapsulation mechanism. This has completely been removed in <SF>xindy</SF> -and we have made cross references real first-class objects. -<P>In <SF>xindy</SF> one can declare different cross reference classes, whose -purpose is (a) to make all instances of a certain class appear next to -each other, and (b) to specify appropriate markup with them. -<P>@begin-comment -One very interesting feature is the ability to <EM>check</EM> the validity -of cross-references. -@end-comment -<P><CODE>tex2xindy</CODE> recognises all index entries of the form -<P> -<PRE> - \index{...|\macro{where}} -</PRE> -<P>as cross references. Here <CODE>macro</CODE> stands for an arbitrary macro -name and <CODE>where</CODE> is interpreted as the target keyword of the cross -references. -<P>If you want to use these cross references with <SF>xindy</SF>; add the -following line to your style file. -<P> -<PRE> - (define-crossref-class "macro") -</PRE> -<P>Additionally, you can assign specific markup to cross references using -the <CODE>markup-crossref</CODE>-commands. -<P> -<P> -<P> -<H2><A NAME="ss4.15">4.15 The keyword mappings don't work as expected!</A> -</H2> - -<P> -<P>Sometimes the keyword mappings don't work as expected. Especially in -cases with several regular expressions one might get confused about -what rule matches exactly when. We have incorporated a detailed -logging mechanism that lets one step by step follow the rules that -accomplish the keyword mapping. -<P>When running <SF>xindy</SF> you can turn on this feature with the command -line option `<CODE>-L</CODE>'. This option followed by one of the numbers 1, -2, or 3 turns on the appropriate debugging level. Turning on level 2 -or 3 and specifying a log-file with the command line option `<CODE>-l</CODE>' -a trace of the mappings is recorded in the log-file. A sample output -looks like the following: -<P> -<BLOCKQUOTE><CODE> -<PRE> -Mappings: (add (merge-rule :eregexp `^\\bf{(.*)}' `\1' :again)). -Mappings: (add (merge-rule :eregexp `^\\"([AEOUaeou])' `\1')). - ... -Mappings: (compare `\"A\"a' :eregexp `^\\bf{(.*)}') -Mappings: (compare `\"A\"a' :eregexp `^\\"([AEOUaeou])') match! -Mappings: (compare `\"a' :eregexp `^\\bf{(.*)}') -Mappings: (compare `\"a' :eregexp `^\\"([AEOUaeou])') match! -Mappings: (merge-mapping `\"A\"a') -> `Aa'. -</PRE> -</CODE></BLOCKQUOTE> -<P>This trace shows that initially two regular expression mappings have -been added to the rule set. The second section shows how the keyword -`<CODE>\"A\"a</CODE>' is compared to these rules and substitutions are -applied as matches are found. In the last line the result of the -keyword mapping is reported. -<P> -<P> -<P> -<H2><A NAME="ss4.16">4.16 I'm totally confused by the markup scheme!</A> -</H2> - -<P> -<P>A very important feature is the ability to <EM>trace</EM> all markup tags -<SF>xindy</SF> emits in the markup phase. Simply use the command line -switch <CODE>-t</CODE> or insert the command -<P> -<BLOCKQUOTE><CODE> -<PRE> -(markup-trace :on) -</PRE> -</CODE></BLOCKQUOTE> -<P>into the index style. This informs <SF>xindy</SF> to emit additional -pseudo markup that can be used to understand and debug the -markup phase. An example output might look like the following: -<P> -<BLOCKQUOTE><CODE> -<PRE> -<INDEX:OPEN> - <LETTER-GROUP-LIST:OPEN> - <LETTER-GROUP:OPEN ["a"]> - <INDEXENTRY-LIST:OPEN [0]> - <INDEXENTRY:OPEN [0]> - <KEYWORD-LIST:OPEN [0]> - <KEYWORD:OPEN [0]> - ... -</PRE> -</CODE></BLOCKQUOTE> -<P>The symbolic tags directly lead one to the command that is responsible -for the definition of that markup tag. For example, the tag -<CODE>LETTER-GROUP-LIST:OPEN</CODE> indicates that the command -<CODE>markup-letter-group-list</CODE> is responsible for replacing this -symbolic tag by a real one. -Give it a try if you find yourself confused by your own markup -specification. -<P> -<P> -<P> -<H2><A NAME="ss4.17">4.17 What editor should I use when writing xindy style files?</A> -</H2> - -<P> -<P>Use <CODE>Emacs</CODE> or <CODE>XEmacs</CODE>. Turn on the Lisp-mode with -<P> -<BLOCKQUOTE><CODE> -<PRE> -M-x lisp-mode -</PRE> -</CODE></BLOCKQUOTE> -<P>and you can properly indent commands using <CODE>M-q</CODE>. To enter this -mode automatically add the following lines to the end of the style -file: -<P> -<BLOCKQUOTE><CODE> -<PRE> -^L -;; Local Variables: -;; mode: lisp -;; End: -</PRE> -</CODE></BLOCKQUOTE> -<P>The <CODE>^L</CODE> (Control-L) can be entered with <CODE>C-q C-l</CODE>. -<P> -<P> -<P> -<HR> -Next -<A HREF="faq-3.html">Previous</A> -<A HREF="faq.html#toc4">Contents</A> -</BODY> -</HTML> |