1 files changed, 6 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/l3kernel/l3fp-expo.dtx b/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/l3kernel/l3fp-expo.dtx
index 521bdae30e6..b0731d99868 100644
--- a/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/l3kernel/l3fp-expo.dtx
+++ b/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/l3kernel/l3fp-expo.dtx
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
 %          {latex-team@latex-project.org}^^A
 %    }^^A
 % }
-% \date{Released 2017/05/29}
+% \date{Released 2017/07/15}
 %
 % \maketitle
 %
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@
 %
 % \emph{The rest of this section is actually not in sync with the code.
 %   Or is the code not in sync with the section?  In the current code,
-%   $c\in [1,10]$ will be such that $0.7\leq ac < 1.4$.}
+%   $c\in [1,10]$ is such that $0.7\leq ac < 1.4$.}
 %
 % We are given a positive normal number, of the form $a\cdot 10^{b}$
 % with $a\in[0.1,1)$.  To compute its logarithm, we find a small integer
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@
     {#1#2#3#4#5} {#6}
   }
 %    \end{macrocode}
-%   The Taylor series will be expressed in terms of
+%   The Taylor series to be used is expressed in terms of
 %   $t = (x-1)/(x+1) = 1 - 2/(x+1)$. We now compute the
 %   quotient with extended precision, reusing some code
 %   from \cs{@@_/_o:ww}. Note that $1+x$ is known exactly.
@@ -520,8 +520,7 @@
 %
 %   For now, $\ln(x)$ is given as $\cdot 10^0$. Unless both the exponent
 %   is $1$ and $c=1$, we shift to working in units of $\cdot 10^4$,
-%   since the final result will be at least $\ln(10/7) \simeq
-%   0.35$.
+%   since the final result is at least $\ln(10/7) \simeq 0.35$.
 %    \begin{macrocode}
 \cs_new:Npn \@@_ln_c:NwNw #1 #2; #3
   {
@@ -542,7 +541,7 @@
 %     \Arg{exponent}
 %   \end{quote}
 %   Compute \meta{exponent} times $\ln(10)$. Apart from the cases where
-%   \meta{exponent} is $0$ or $1$, the result will necessarily be at
+%   \meta{exponent} is $0$ or $1$, the result is necessarily at
 %   least $\ln(10) \simeq 2.3$ in magnitude. We can thus drop the least
 %   significant $4$ digits. In the case of a very large (positive or
 %   negative) exponent, we can (and we need to) drop $4$ additional
@@ -1157,7 +1156,7 @@
 %   undefined.  This is invalid, unless $|a|^b$ turns out to be $+0$ or
 %   \texttt{nan}, in which case we return that as $a^b$.  In particular,
 %   since the underflow detection occurs before \cs{@@_pow_neg:www} is
-%   called, |(-0.1)**(12345.67)| will give $+0$ rather than complaining
+%   called, |(-0.1)**(12345.67)| gives $+0$ rather than complaining
 %   that the sign is not defined.
 %    \begin{macrocode}
 \cs_new:Npn \@@_pow_neg:www \s_@@ \@@_chk:w #1#2; #3; #4;