diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/resphilosophica/rpsample.tex')
-rw-r--r-- | Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/resphilosophica/rpsample.tex | 136 |
1 files changed, 136 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/resphilosophica/rpsample.tex b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/resphilosophica/rpsample.tex new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..11786fa8d87 --- /dev/null +++ b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/resphilosophica/rpsample.tex @@ -0,0 +1,136 @@ +%\documentclass[screen]{resphilosophica} +%\documentclass[manuscript]{resphilosophica} +\documentclass{resphilosophica} +\usepackage{kantlipsum} + +\begin{document} +% +% Paper information +% +% +% We do not want \\ in the headers, hence the +% optional argument for \title +\title[A Sample Paper: A Template]{A Sample Paper:\\ A Template} +\volumenumber{90} +\issuenumber{1--2} +\publicationyear{2013} +\publicationmonth{January--February} +\doinumber{100.200/rp-32-56-78} +\author{Boris Veytsman} +\address{Computational Materials Science Center, MS 6A2\\ + George Mason University\\ + Fairfax, VA 22030\\ + USA} +\email{borisv@lk.net} +\urladdr{http://borisv.lk.net} + +% The next affiliation refers to both authors here +\author{A. U. Th\o r} +\author{C. O. R\"espondent} +\address{Kant-Forschungsstelle Universit\"at Mainz\\ + Colonel-Kleinmann-Weg 2\\ + 55128 Mainz\\ + Germany} +\thanks{The work on this package was supported by Sant Lois University} + +% Abstract must PRECEDE \maketitle +\begin{abstract} + The things in themselves are what first give rise to reason, as is + proven in the ontological manuals. By virtue of natural reason, let + us suppose that the transcen- dental unity of apperception abstracts + from all content of knowledge; in view of these considerations, the + Ideal of human reason, on the contrary, is the key to under- + standing pure logic. Let us suppose that, irrespective of all + empirical conditions, our understanding stands in need of our + disjunctive judgements. +\end{abstract} +\maketitle + + +\section{Introduction} +\label{sec:intro} + +\begin{quotation} + \em + The reader should be careful to observe that the objects in + space and time are the clue to the discovery of, certainly, + our a priori knowledge, by means of analytic unity. Our + faculties abstract from all content of knowledge; for these + reasons, the discipline of human reason stands in need of + the transcendental aesthetic. + \em \citep{Gregorio:Kantlipsum} +\EditorialComment{Is this quotation necessary?} +\end{quotation} + +\bigskip +\noindent % normally the first paragraph after a section header is not + % indented automatically, but since we have an epigraph + % here, we need to explicitly suppress indentation. +\kant[2-4]\kant[34] + +\kant*[6]\footnote{As is shown in the writings of Aristotle, pure + logic, in the case of the discipline of natural reason, abstracts + from all content of knowledge. Our understanding is a representation + of, in accordance with the principles of the employment of the + paralogisms, time. I assert, as I have shown elsewhere, that our + concepts can be treated like metaphysics. See also + \citep{Hoff10} and \citep{Knuth94:TheTeXbook}.} + +\section{Discussion} +\label{sec:discussion} + +\subsection{Negative Arguments} +\label{sec:negative} + + +We can deduce that the Ideal of practical reason, even as this relates +to our knowledge, is a representation of the discipline of human +reason. The things in themselves are just as necessary as our +understanding.\footnote{As is proven in the ontological manuals, it + remains a mystery why our experience is the mere result of the power + of the discipline of human reason, a blind but indispensable + function of the soul. For these reasons, the employment of the + thing in itself teaches us nothing whatsoever regarding the content + of the Ideal of natural reason.} The noumena prove the validity of +the manifold. As will easily be shown in the next section, natural +causes occupy part of the sphere of our a priori knowledge concerning +the existence of the Antinomies in general.\footnote{The never-ending + regress in the series of empirical conditions can be treated like + the objects in space and time. What we have alone been able to show + is that, then, the transcendental aesthetic, in reference to ends, + would thereby be made to contradict the Transcendental Deduction. + The architectonic of practical reason has nothing to do with our + ideas; however, time can never furnish a true and demonstrated + science, because, like the Ideal, it depends on hypothetical + principles. Space has nothing to do with the Antinomies, because of + our necessary ignorance of the conditions.} + + + +\kant[6-8] + +\subsubsection{An Aside on Numbers} + +\kant[124] + +\subsection{Positive Arguments} +\label{sec:positive} + +\kant[12-14] + +\section{Conclusions} +\label{sec:concl} + +\EditorialComment{A numbered list of conclusions might be better} +\kant[17-20] + +\kant*[21]\footnote{As is shown in the writings of Hume, it remains a + mystery why our judgements exclude the possibility of the + transcendental aesthetic.} + + + + +\bibliography{rpsample} + +\end{document} |