summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/proposal/examples/fetopenstrep/methodology.tex
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/proposal/examples/fetopenstrep/methodology.tex')
-rw-r--r--Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/proposal/examples/fetopenstrep/methodology.tex59
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 59 deletions
diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/proposal/examples/fetopenstrep/methodology.tex b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/proposal/examples/fetopenstrep/methodology.tex
deleted file mode 100644
index 4614aeee0da..00000000000
--- a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/proposal/examples/fetopenstrep/methodology.tex
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,59 +0,0 @@
-\svnInfo $Id: methodology.tex 22870 2012-01-02 11:01:58Z kohlhase $
-\svnKeyword $HeadURL: https://svn.kwarc.info/repos/kwarc/doc/macros/forCTAN/proposal/eu/examples/fetopenstrep/methodology.tex $
-\section[S/T Methodology]{S/T Methodology\footnote{Note that, whereas the scientific and technological methodology is evaluated
-under the criteria ‘S/T quality’, the quality of the
-actual workplan is evaluated under FET-Open under the criteria ‘Implementation’.}}\label{sec:methodology}
-\begin{todo}{from the proposal template}
-Provide a detailed description of the scientific and technological approach or methodology
-by which you will attempt to reach your objectives. Demonstrate that you are aware of the
-level and nature of the risks of failure, and that you have a good idea on how to address
-these risks. Describe a progression of crucial milestones and decision points for your
-project, and their expected timing. What would constitute success? What would you learn
-from an eventual failure? Where relevant, show how your approach takes into account the
-difficulties inherent to the multi-disciplinary nature of the idea or approach that you
-are proposing.
- A detailed work plan should be presented, broken down into work
-packages\footnote{A work package is a major sub-division of the proposed project with a
- verifiable end-point – normally a deliverable or an important milestone in the overall
- project.} (WPs) which should follow the logical phases of the implementation of the
-project, and include consortium management and assessment of progress and results. (Note
-that your overall approach to management will be described later, in Section 2).
-
-Notes: The number of work packages used must be appropriate to the complexity of the work
-and the overall value of the proposed project. The planning should be sufficiently
-detailed to justify the proposed effort and allow progress monitoring by the Commission.
-
-\end{todo}
-\newpage\input{workplan}
-
-\newpage
-\subsection{Work Package List}\label{sec:wplist}
-
-\begin{todo}{from the proposal template}
-Please indicate one activity per work package:
-RTD = Research and technological development; DEM = Demonstration; MGT = Management of the consortium
-\end{todo}
-
-%\makeatletter\wp@total@RM{management}\makeatother
-\wpfig[pages,type]
-
-\newpage\input{../strep/deliverables}
-\newpage\input{../strep/milestones}
-
-\subsection{Work Package Descriptions}\label{sec:workpackages}
-\begin{workplan}
-\input{../strep/wp-management}\newpage
-\input{../strep/wp-dissem}\newpage
-\input{../strep/wp-class}\newpage
-\input{../strep/wp-temple}\newpage
-\end{workplan}
-\newpage\input{../strep/risks}
-
-
-%%% Local Variables:
-%%% mode: latex
-%%% TeX-master: "propB"
-%%% End:
-
-% LocalWords: workplan newpage wplist makeatletter makeatother wpfig
-% LocalWords: workpackages wp-dissem wp-class wp-temple