diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/newlfm/problems.tex')
-rw-r--r-- | Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/newlfm/problems.tex | 115 |
1 files changed, 115 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/newlfm/problems.tex b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/newlfm/problems.tex new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..231bd7c34a2 --- /dev/null +++ b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/newlfm/problems.tex @@ -0,0 +1,115 @@ +<x-flowed> +Thank you for promulgating the newlfm.cls letter/fax/memo class. I am +gearing up to use it in my daily work, and am also using it to try to +improve my LaTeX and (nearly-nonexistent) TeX skills. + +I am having the following problem in the "Regarding" section, which I +believe is due to a bug. + +In the attached testmemo.tex file, when I use the option "stdletter", +the "Regarding" line prints out "Testing"; however, when I use the +option "stdmemo", the "Re" line prints out "---BLANK---". As near +as I can tell, the @re@line variable is not being set correctly, but +with my basic and rudimentary TeX skills, I'm at a loss to figure out how. + +Attached are extracd.tex, letrinfo.tex, and my test case, +testmemo.tex. I am using newlfm v 8.3, downloaded this past week from +CTAN. + +Any help would be appreciated. Thanks again. + + + James +James K. Gruetzner, Ph.D. + +Resolution: Fixed - cannot duplicate + +--------------------------------------------------------------------- +> > I've been using newlfm over quite a few incarnations, and have +> > discovered a bug/feature on which you may be able to comment. +> > +> > While it may not be your preferred or recommended means of +> > operation, in my role as secretary of an organisation, I sometimes +> > choose to place all the letters arising from a particular meeting in + + +> > the one file (eg Letters_2004_10_29.tex). What seems to happen is +> > that when the file is processed, I get the first letter then its +> > envelope, then the second letter and the envelopes for the FIRST and + + +> > second letters, then the third letter and the envelopes for the +> > FIRST, SECOND, and third letters, end so on. I think this behaviour + + +> > started about the time that you added the required functiuonality +> > from the geometry package. As far as I can tell, my file is not +> > bizarre, just a series of \begin{newlfm} ... \end{newlfm} +> > environments with the necessary addresses and phrase customisations +> > etc. Likewise, the same effect occurred with a form letter just +> > recently so I suspect a glitch in the +> +> > interface between newlfm and envlab. +> > +> > I may have misunderstood some parameter settings, or may have an old + +Fixed +---------------------------------------------------------------- +Dear Dr. Thompson, + +I have just begun using your newlfm package and have already found it +highly useful. Thank you very much for making it available to us. + +I am writing today to inform you that newlfm may have a minor bug. The +newlfm that I am using is of version "2004/11/02 v8.3". It seems that +this version ignores the memonoto, memonofrom, and memono +options. Looking at the code of newlfm, I think that "true" in lines +513, 515, and 517 should be replaced with "false". + + + 513: \DeclareOption{memonofrom} {\setboolean{@memo@e}{true}}% + ^^^^ + 514: \define@key{ov}{memonofrom}[true]{\iffixt{#1}{@memo@e}}% + 515: \DeclareOption{memonoto} {\setboolean{@memo@g}{true}}% + ^^^^ + 516: \define@key{ov}{memonoto}[true]{\iffixt{#1}{@memo@g}}% + 517: \DeclareOption{memonore} {\setboolean{@memo@f}{true}}% + ^^^^ + 518: \define@key{ov}{memonore}[true]{\iffixt{#1}{@memo@f}}% + + +Thanks again for your offering the wonderful newlfm. + +----------------------------------- +Fixed + + +----------------------------------- + +I just started using 2004/11/02 v8.3 of newlfm. Nice job! + + +I'm having a small problem though. I have specified a custom header +with graphics and that is working properly. If I try to specify the +Blankheader option to turn it off, the file fails to format and I get +an error. I have a feeling that I'm not specifying this option +properly and I couldn't find it in any of your examples. + + +How do I invoke this option? + + +Thanks, + + +Rick Zaccone +Computer Science Department +Bucknell University + +---- +FIxed + +%%% Local Variables: +%%% mode: latex +%%% TeX-master: "d" +%%% End: |