diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/guide-to-latex/exercises/chap11/exer11-5.tex')
-rw-r--r-- | Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/guide-to-latex/exercises/chap11/exer11-5.tex | 136 |
1 files changed, 136 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/guide-to-latex/exercises/chap11/exer11-5.tex b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/guide-to-latex/exercises/chap11/exer11-5.tex new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..cd64bb15fc3 --- /dev/null +++ b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/guide-to-latex/exercises/chap11/exer11-5.tex @@ -0,0 +1,136 @@ +\documentclass{article} +\begin{document} +\section*{Preface to the \LaTeX-Guide} + +A new edition to ``A Guide to \LaTeX'' begs the fundamental question: +Has \LaTeX\ changed so much since the appearance of the third edition in 1999 +that a new release of this manual is justified? + +The simple answer to that question is `Well \dots.' In 1994, the \LaTeX\ +world was in upheaval with the issue of the new version \LaTeXe, and the +second edition of the `Guide' came out just then to act as the bridge +between the old and new versions. By 1998, the initial teething problems had +been worked out and corrected through semi-annual releases, and the third +edition could describe an established, working system. However, homage was +still paid to the older 2.09 version since many users still employed its +familiar syntax, although they were most likely to be using it in a \LaTeXe\ +environment. \LaTeX\ has now reached a degree of stability that since 2000 +the regular updates have been reduced to annual events, which often appear +months after the nominal date, something that does not worry anyone. The old +version 2.09 is obsolete and should no longer play any role in such a manual. +In this fourth edition, it is reduced to an appendix just to document its +syntax and usage. + +The developement of \LaTeX\ between 1992 until now will be best demonstrated +by the four editions of the \LaTeX-Guide textbook. The first edition +\cite{dal92} describes and teaches the old version 2.09, which is now obsolete. +With the occurance of \LaTeXe\ the second edition \cite{dal95} was presented, +explainig and teaching both versions in parallel. In the third edition +\cite{dal99} the \LaTeX\ presentation was mainly restricted to \LaTeXe\ +and still more restricted with the present edition \cite{dal03} + +But if \LaTeX\ itself has not changed substantially since 1999, many of its +peripherals have. The rise of programs like `pdf\TeX' and `dvipdfm' for +PDF output adds new possibilities, which are realized, not in \LaTeX\ +directly, but by means of more modern `packages' to extend the basic +features. The distribution of \TeX/\LaTeX\ installations has changed, such +that most users are given a complete, ready-to-run setup, with all the +`extras' that one used to have to obtain oneself. Those extras include +user-contributed packages, many of which are now considered indispensable. +Today `the \LaTeX\ system' includes much more than the basic kernel by Leslie +Lamport, encompassing the contributions of hundreds of other people. This +edition reflects this increase in breadth. + +The changes to the fourth edition are mainly those of emphasis. + +1. The material has been reorganized into `Basics' and `Beyond the Basics' + (`advanced' sounds too intimidating) while the appendices contain + topics that really can be skipped by most everyday users. Exception: + Appendix H is an alphabetized command summary that many + people find extremely useful (including ourselves). + + This reorganizing is meant to stress certain aspects over others. For + example, the section on graphics inclusion and color was originally + treated as an exotic freak, relegated to an appendix on extensions; in the + third edition, it moved up to be included in a front chapter along with the + picture environment and floats; now it dominates + Chapter 6 all on its own, the floats come in the following + Chapter 7, and `picture' is banished to the later + Chapter 13. This is not to say that the picture features are no good, + but only that they are very specialized. We add + descriptions of additional drawing possibilities there too. + +2. It is stressed as much as possible that \LaTeX\ is a markup language, + with separation of content and form. Typographical settings + should be placed in the preamble, while the body contains only logical + markup. This is in keeping with the modern ideas of XML, where form and + content are radically segregated. + +3. Throughout this edition, contributed packages are explained at that point + in the text where they are most relevant. The `fancyhdr' package + comes in the section on page styles, `natbib' where literature + citations are explained. This stresses that these `extensions' are part of + the \LaTeX\ system as a whole. However, to remind the user that they must + still be explicitly loaded, a marginal note is placed at the start of their + descriptions. + +4. PDF output is taken for granted throughout the book, in addition to the + classical DVI format. This means that the added possibilities of `pdf\TeX' + and `dvipdfm' are explained where they are relevant. A separate + Chapter 10 on PostScript and PDF is still necessary, and the + best interface to PDF output, the `hyperref' package by Sebastian + Rahtz, is explained in detail. PDF is also included in + Chapter 15 on presentation material + + On the other hand, the other Web output formats, HTML and XML, are only + dealt with briefly in Appendix E, since these are large topics + treated in other books, most noticeably the `\LaTeX\ Web Companion'. + +5. This book is being distributed with the \TeX Live CD, with the kind + permission of Sebastian Rahtz who maintains it for the \TeX\ Users Group. + It contains a full \TeX\ and \LaTeX\ installation for Windows, Macintosh, + and Linux, plus many of the myriad extensions that exist. + +We once again express our hope that this \textsl{Guide} will prove more than +useful to all those who wish to find their way through the intricate world of +\LaTeX. And with the addition of the \TeX Live CD, that world is brought even +closer to their doorsteps. + +\newpage + +\begin{thebibliography}{\hspace{1.5cm}} +\bibitem[abr90]{abr90} Abraham P. W., with Hargraves K. A. and Berry K. (1990). + \textsl{\TeX\ for the Impatient.} Reading MA: Addison-Wesley +\bibitem[bec93]{bec93} Bechtolsheim, S. von (1993) \textsl{\TeX\ in Practice, + Vol.\ I--IV,} New York: Springer +\bibitem[bec93a]{bec93a} Vol.\ I: Basics +\bibitem[bec93b]{bec93b} Vol.\ II: Paragraphs, Math, and Fonts +\bibitem[bec93c]{bec93c} Vol.\ III: Tokens, Macros +\bibitem[bec93d]{bec93d} Vol.\ IV: Output Routines, Tables +\bibitem[dal92]{dal92} Daly P. W. and Kopka H. (1992) {A Guide to \LaTeX.} + Workingham, UK: Addison-Wesley +\bibitem[dal95]{dal95} Daly P. W. and Kopka H. (1995) {A Guide to \LaTeX,} + 2nd ed. Workingham, UK: Addison-Wesley +\bibitem[dal99]{dal99} Daly P. W. and Kopka H. (1999) {A Guide to \LaTeX,} + 3rd ed. Workingham, UK: Addison-Wesley +\bibitem[dal03]{dal03} Daly P. W. and Kopka H. (2003) {A Guide to \LaTeX,} + 4th ed. Workingham, UK: Addison-Wesley +\bibitem[eij92]{eij92} Eijkhout V. (1992). \textsl{\TeX\ by Topic, a + \TeX nician's Referenc.} Harlow: Addison-Wesley +\bibitem[goo94]{goo94} Goossens M., Mittelbach F. and Samarin A. (1994). + \textsl{The \LaTeX\ Companion.} Reading MA: Adddison-Wesley +\bibitem[goo97]{goo97} Goossens M., Rahtz S. and Mittelbach F. (1997). + \textsl{The \LaTeX\ Graphic Companion.} Reading MA: Addison-Wesley +\bibitem[goo99]{goo99} Goossens M. and Rahtz S. (1999). + \textsl{The \LaTeX\ Web Companion.} Reading MA: Addison-Wesley +\bibitem[knu91]{knu91} Knuth D. E. (1991) \textsl{Computers and Typesetting + Vol A--E.} Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley +\bibitem[knu91a]{knu91a} Knuth D. E. (1991a) Vol. A: \textsl{The \TeX book.} + 11.~ed. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley +\bibitem[knu91b]{knu91b} Knuth D. E. (1991b) Vol. B: \textsl{The Program.} + 4.~ed. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley +\bibitem[lam94]{lam94} Lamport L. (1994) \textsl{\LaTeX---A Document + Preparation System}, 2nd ed. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley + Addison-Wesley-Longman (Deutschland) GmbH. Bonn 1995 +\end{thebibliography} +\end{document} |