summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/biblatex-chicago.tex
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/biblatex-chicago.tex')
-rw-r--r--Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/biblatex-chicago.tex184
1 files changed, 105 insertions, 79 deletions
diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/biblatex-chicago.tex b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/biblatex-chicago.tex
index dbc00cbe217..d0aaa942d26 100644
--- a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/biblatex-chicago.tex
+++ b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/biblatex-chicago.tex
@@ -49,6 +49,13 @@
{\baselineskip}%
{.5\baselineskip}%
{\sffamily\normalsize\bfseries}}%
+\renewcommand{\paragraph}{\@startsection
+ {paragraph}%
+ {1}%
+ {\z@}%
+ {\baselineskip}%3.25ex \@plus1ex \@minus.2ex}%
+ {0mm}%
+ {}}%
\makeatother
\begin{document}
\begin{center}
@@ -56,7 +63,7 @@
Style files for biblatex
\vspace{.3\baselineskip}
-\sffamily\normalsize\bfseries David Fussner\qquad Version 0.9.9d (beta) \\
+\sffamily\normalsize\bfseries David Fussner\qquad Version 0.9.9e (beta) \\
\href{mailto:djf027@googlemail.com}{djf027@googlemail.com}\\ \today
\end{center}
@@ -151,7 +158,7 @@ this release.
\begin{itemize}{}{}
\item Philipp Lehman's \textsf{biblatex} package, of course! You must
- use the latest version(s) --- 1.7 or 2.8 at the time of writing ---
+ use the latest version(s) --- 1.7 or 2.8a at the time of writing ---
as my code relies on features and bug fixes only available in the
most recent release. Lehman's tools require several packages, and
he strongly recommends several more:
@@ -177,7 +184,7 @@ this release.
use the following:
\item \textsf{Biber} --- the next-generation \textsc{Bib}\TeX\
replacement, which is available from SourceForge. You should use
- the latest version, 1.8, to work with \textsf{biblatex} 2.8 and
+ the latest version, 1.8, to work with \textsf{biblatex} 2.8a and
\textsf{biblatex-chicago}, and it is required for users who are
either using the author-date styles or processing a .bib file in
Unicode. See \textsf{cms-dates-sample.pdf} and, for example, the
@@ -319,7 +326,7 @@ this release.
\subsection{License}
\label{sec:lppl}
-Copyright © 2008--2013 David Fussner. This package is
+Copyright © 2008--2014 David Fussner. This package is
author-maintained. This work may be copied, distributed and/or
modified under the conditions of the \LaTeX\ Project Public License,
either version 1.3 of this license or (at your option) any later
@@ -1460,35 +1467,37 @@ you must be using \textsf{Biber} for the settings to apply. See
harley:ancient:cart, harley:cartography, and harley:hoc for how this
might look.
-\mybigspace The \mymarginpar{\textbf{online}} \emph{Manual}'s
-scattered instructions (14.4--13, 14.166--169, 14.184--185, 14.200,
-14.223, 14.243--246) for citing online materials are slightly
-different from those suggested by standard \textsf{biblatex}. Indeed,
-this is a case where complete backward compatibility with other
-\textsf{biblatex} styles may be impossible, because as a general rule
-the \emph{Manual} considers relevant not only where a source is found,
-but also the nature of that source, e.g., if it's an online edition of
-a book (james:ambassadors), then it calls for a \textsf{book} entry.
-Even if you cite an intrinsically online source, if that source is
-structured more or less like a conventional printed periodical, then
-you'll probably want to use \textsf{article} or \textsf{review}
-instead of \textsf{online} (stenger:privacy, which cites
-\emph{CNN.com}). The 16th edition's suggestions for blogs lend
-themselves well to the \textsf{article} type, too, while comments
-become, logically, \textsf{reviews} (14.243--6; ellis:blog,
-ac:comment). Otherwise, for online documents not \enquote{formally
- published,} the \textsf{online} type is usually the best choice
-(evanston:library, powell:email). Online videos, in particular short
-pieces or those that present excerpts of some longer event or work,
-and also online interviews, usually require this type, too. (See
-harwood:biden, horowitz:youtube, pollan:plant, but cp.\ weed:flatiron,
-a complete film, which requires a \textsf{video} entry. Online audio
-pieces, particularly dated ones from an archive, work best as
-\textsf{misc} entries with an \textsf{entrysubtype}: coolidge:speech,
-roosevelt:speech.) Some online materials will, no doubt, make it
-difficult to choose an entry type, but so long as all locating
-information is present, then perhaps that is enough to fulfill the
-specification, or at least so I'd like to hope.
+\paragraph*{\mymarginpar{\textbf{online}}}
+\label{sec:online}
+
+The \emph{Manual}'s scattered instructions (14.4--13, 14.166--169,
+14.184--185, 14.200, 14.223, 14.243--246) for citing online materials
+are slightly different from those suggested by standard
+\textsf{biblatex}. Indeed, this is a case where complete backward
+compatibility with other \textsf{biblatex} styles may be impossible,
+because as a general rule the \emph{Manual} considers relevant not
+only where a source is found, but also the nature of that source,
+e.g., if it's an online edition of a book (james:ambassadors), then it
+calls for a \textsf{book} entry. Even if you cite an intrinsically
+online source, if that source is structured more or less like a
+conventional printed periodical, then you'll probably want to use
+\textsf{article} or \textsf{review} instead of \textsf{online}
+(stenger:privacy, which cites \emph{CNN.com}). The 16th edition's
+suggestions for blogs lend themselves well to the \textsf{article}
+type, too, while comments become, logically, \textsf{reviews}
+(14.243--6; ellis:blog, ac:comment). Otherwise, for online documents
+not \enquote{formally published,} the \textsf{online} type is usually
+the best choice (evanston:library, powell:email). Online videos, in
+particular short pieces or those that present excerpts of some longer
+event or work, and also online interviews, usually require this type,
+too. (See harwood:biden, horowitz:youtube, pollan:plant, but cp.\
+weed:flatiron, a complete film, which requires a \textsf{video} entry.
+Online audio pieces, particularly dated ones from an archive, work
+best as \textsf{misc} entries with an \textsf{entrysubtype}:
+coolidge:speech, roosevelt:speech.) Some online materials will, no
+doubt, make it difficult to choose an entry type, but so long as all
+locating information is present, then perhaps that is enough to
+fulfill the specification, or at least so I'd like to hope.
\mylittlespace Constructing an \textsf{online} .bib file entry is much
the same as in \textsf{biblatex}. The \textsf{title} field would
@@ -1884,9 +1893,11 @@ undefined, and \textsf{biblatex-chicago-notes} will do the rest. Cf.\
\textsf{foreword} and \textsf{introduction}. (See \emph{Manual} 14.91,
14.116; polakow:afterw.)
-\mybigspace At \mymarginpar{\textbf{annotation}} \label{sec:annote}
-the request of Emil Salim, \textsf{biblatex-chicago-notes} has, as of
-version 0.9, added a package option (see \texttt{annotation} below,
+\paragraph*{\mymarginpar{\textbf{annotation}}}
+\label{sec:annote}
+
+At the request of Emil Salim, \textsf{biblatex-chicago-notes} has, as
+of version 0.9, added a package option (see \texttt{annotation} below,
section \ref{sec:useropts}) to allow you to produce annotated
bibliographies. The formatting of such a bibliography is currently
fairly basic, though it conforms with the \emph{Manual's} minimal
@@ -2113,22 +2124,24 @@ be useful for some purposes. Cf.\ \textsf{annotator}.
\enlargethispage{\baselineskip}
-\mybigspace This \colmarginpar{\textbf{crossref}} field is the
-standard \textsc{Bib}\TeX\ cross-referencing mechanism, and
-\textsf{biblatex} has adopted it while also introducing a modified one
-of its own (\textsf{xref}). If you are using \textsc{Bib}\TeX\ (or
-\textsf{bibtex8)} the \textsf{crossref} field works exactly the same
-as it always has, while \textsf{xref} attempts to remedy some of the
-deficiencies of the usual mechanism by ensuring that child entries
-will inherit no data at all from their parents. Section~2.4.1.1 of
-\textsf{biblatex.pdf} contains useful notes on the intricacies of
-managing cross-referenced entries with these traditional backends, and
-for the most part these backends are still usable, if inconvenient.
-New functionality, discussed below, for abbreviating references in
-\textsf{book}, \textsf{bookinbook}, \textsf{collection}, and
-\textsf{proceedings} entries, and for using the new
-\mycolor{\textsf{mv*}} entry types to do so, will prove extremely
-difficult with the older backends, so if you plan on lots of
+\paragraph*{\colmarginpar{\textbf{crossref}}}
+\label{sec:crossref}
+
+This field is the standard \textsc{Bib}\TeX\ cross-referencing
+mechanism, and \textsf{biblatex} has adopted it while also introducing
+a modified one of its own (\textsf{xref}). If you are using
+\textsc{Bib}\TeX\ (or \textsf{bibtex8)} the \textsf{crossref} field
+works exactly the same as it always has, while \textsf{xref} attempts
+to remedy some of the deficiencies of the usual mechanism by ensuring
+that child entries will inherit no data at all from their parents.
+Section~2.4.1.1 of \textsf{biblatex.pdf} contains useful notes on the
+intricacies of managing cross-referenced entries with these
+traditional backends, and for the most part these backends are still
+usable, if inconvenient. New functionality, discussed below, for
+abbreviating references in \textsf{book}, \textsf{bookinbook},
+\textsf{collection}, and \textsf{proceedings} entries, and for using
+the new \mycolor{\textsf{mv*}} entry types to do so, will prove
+extremely difficult with the older backends, so if you plan on lots of
cross-referencing in \textsf{biblatex-chicago-notes} then I strongly
recommend you use \textsf{Biber}.
@@ -2539,16 +2552,18 @@ identify a particular article. Only applicable to the
\textsf{article} entry type. Not typically required by the
\emph{Manual}.
-\mybigspace Standard \mymarginpar{\textbf{entrysubtype}} and very
-powerful \textsf{biblatex} field, left undefined by the standard
-styles. In \textsf{biblatex-chicago-notes} it has four very specific
-uses, the first three of which I have designed in order to maintain,
-as much as possible, backward compatibility with the standard styles.
-First, in \textsf{article}, \textsf{periodical}, and \textsf{review}
-entries, the field allows you to differentiate between scholarly
-\enquote{journals,} on the one hand, and \enquote{magazines} and
-\enquote{newspapers} on the other. Usage is fairly simple: you need
-to put the exact string \texttt{magazine} into the
+\paragraph*{\mymarginpar{\textbf{entrysubtype}}}
+\label{sec:entrysub}
+
+Standard and very powerful \textsf{biblatex} field, left undefined by
+the standard styles. In \textsf{biblatex-chicago-notes} it has four
+very specific uses, the first three of which I have designed in order
+to maintain, as much as possible, backward compatibility with the
+standard styles. First, in \textsf{article}, \textsf{periodical}, and
+\textsf{review} entries, the field allows you to differentiate between
+scholarly \enquote{journals,} on the one hand, and \enquote{magazines}
+and \enquote{newspapers} on the other. Usage is fairly simple: you
+need to put the exact string \texttt{magazine} into the
\textsf{entrysubtype} field if you are citing one of the latter two
types of source, whereas if your source is a \enquote{journal,} then
you need do nothing.
@@ -3334,20 +3349,23 @@ preferences regarding the formatting of numerals.
\enlargethispage{\baselineskip}
-\mybigspace This \mymarginpar{\textbf{shortauthor}} is a standard
-\textsf{biblatex} field, but \textsf{biblatex-chicago-notes} makes
-considerably grea\-ter use of it than the standard styles. For the
-purposes of the Chicago style, the field provides the name to be used
-in the short form of a footnote. In the vast majority of cases, you
-don't need to specify it, because the \textsf{biblatex} system selects
-the author's last name from the \textsf{author} field and uses it in
-such a reference, and if there is no \textsf{author} it will search
-\textsf{namea}, \textsf{editor}, \textsf{nameb}, \textsf{translator},
-and \textsf{namec}, in that order. (In the case of the non-standard
-names \textsf{name[a-c]}, you will need to provide a \textsf{sortkey}
-if you aren't using \textsf{Biber}. Cf.\ \cmd{DeclareSortingScheme}
-and \cmd{DeclareLabelname} in section~\ref{sec:formatopts}, below.)
-In an author-less \textsf{article} or \textsf{review} entry
+\paragraph*{\mymarginpar{\textbf{shortauthor}}}
+\label{sec:shortauthor}
+
+This is a standard \textsf{biblatex} field, but
+\textsf{biblatex-chicago-notes} makes considerably grea\-ter use of it
+than the standard styles. For the purposes of the Chicago style, the
+field provides the name to be used in the short form of a footnote.
+In the vast majority of cases, you don't need to specify it, because
+the \textsf{biblatex} system selects the author's last name from the
+\textsf{author} field and uses it in such a reference, and if there is
+no \textsf{author} it will search \textsf{namea}, \textsf{editor},
+\textsf{nameb}, \textsf{translator}, and \textsf{namec}, in that
+order. (In the case of the non-standard names \textsf{name[a-c]}, you
+will need to provide a \textsf{sortkey} if you aren't using
+\textsf{Biber}. Cf.\ \cmd{DeclareSortingScheme} and
+\cmd{DeclareLabelname} in section~\ref{sec:formatopts}, below.) In an
+author-less \textsf{article} or \textsf{review} entry
(\textsf{entrysubtype} \texttt{magazine}), where
\textsf{biblatex-chicago-notes} will use the \textsf{journaltitle} as
the author, or in author-less \textsf{manual} entries, where the
@@ -4723,8 +4741,8 @@ option will be ignored in \textsf{article}, \textsf{misc},
\textsf{periodical}, and \textsf{review} fields.
\mylittlespace This
-\mymarginpar{\vspace{-1\baselineskip}\texttt{completenotes}%
- \\\vspace{\baselineskip}\texttt{=true}} is the one option that rules
+\mymarginpar{\vspace{-1\baselineskip}\texttt{completenotes=}%
+ \\\texttt{true}} is the one option that rules
the three preceding, either printing all the fields under
consideration --- the default --- or excluding all of them from long
notes. It is set to \texttt{true} in \textsf{chicago-notes.cbx}, but
@@ -10661,7 +10679,15 @@ code for it, let me know, and I'll look into it.
\section{Revision History}
\label{sec:history}
-\textbf{0.9.9d: Released \today}
+\textbf{0.9.9e: Released \today}
+\begin{itemize}
+\item This minor release fixes a regression in the \emph{Ibidem}
+ mechanism in the notes \&\ bibliography style, spotted by Harold
+ Bellemare, and present in the package since version 0.9.9c. In all
+ other respects this release is identical to 0.9.9d.
+\end{itemize}
+
+\textbf{0.9.9d: Released October 30, 2013}
\begin{itemize}
\item Following requests by Kenneth~L.\ Pearce and Bertold Schweitzer,
I have modified and extended the mechanism for creating abbreviated