summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Master/texmf-dist/doc/generic/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-dolldoll.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'Master/texmf-dist/doc/generic/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-dolldoll.html')
-rw-r--r--Master/texmf-dist/doc/generic/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-dolldoll.html14
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/generic/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-dolldoll.html b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/generic/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-dolldoll.html
index f3a5438fc1a..492e01c31cd 100644
--- a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/generic/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-dolldoll.html
+++ b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/generic/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-dolldoll.html
@@ -1,32 +1,32 @@
<head>
<title>UK TeX FAQ -- question label dolldoll</title>
</head><body>
-<h3>Why use <code>\</code><code>[</code> &hellip;<code>\</code><code>]</code> in place of <code>$$</code> &hellip;<code>$$</code>?</h3>
+<h3>Why use <code>\</code><code>[</code> &#8230;<code>\</code><code>]</code> in place of <code>$$</code> &#8230;<code>$$</code>?</h3>
<p/>LaTeX defines inline- and display-maths commands, apparently
s those that derive from the TeX primitive maths
sequences bracketing maths commands with single (or pairs of) dollar signs.
-<p/>As it turns out, LaTeX&rsquo;s inline maths grouping,
+<p/>As it turns out, LaTeX&#8217;s inline maths grouping,
<code>\</code><code>(</code><code> ... </code><code>\</code><code>)</code>, has precisely the same effect as the
TeX primitive version <code>$ ... $</code>. (Except that
-the LaTeX version checks to ensure you don&rsquo;t put <code>\</code><code>(</code> and
+the LaTeX version checks to ensure you don&#8217;t put <code>\</code><code>(</code> and
<code>\</code><code>)</code> the wrong way round.)
<p/>In this circumstance, one often finds LaTeX users, who have some
-experience of using Plain TeX, merely assuming that LaTeX&rsquo;s
+experience of using Plain TeX, merely assuming that LaTeX&#8217;s
display maths grouping <code>\</code><code>[</code><code> ... </code><code>\</code><code>]</code> may be replaced by
the TeX primitive display maths <code>$$ ... $$</code>.
<p/>Unfortunately, they are wrong: if LaTeX code is going to patch display
maths, it can only do so by patching <code>\</code><code>[</code> and <code>\</code><code>]</code>. The most
obvious way this turns up, is that the class option <code>fleqn</code>
simply does not work for equations coded using
-<code>$$ ... $$</code>, whether you&rsquo;re using the standard classes
+<code>$$ ... $$</code>, whether you&#8217;re using the standard classes
alone, or using package <i>amsmath</i>. Also, the <code>\</code><code>[</code> and
<code>\</code><code>]</code> construct has code for rationalising vertical spacing in some extreme
cases; that code is not available in <code>$$ ... $$</code>, so if you
use the non-standard version, you may occasionally observe
inconsistent vertical spacing .
<p/>There are more subtle effects (especially with package
-<i>amsmath</i>), and the simple rule is &ldquo;use
+<i>amsmath</i>), and the simple rule is &#8220;use
<code>\</code><code>[</code><code> ... </code><code>\</code><code>]</code> whenever displayed maths is needed in
-LaTeX&rdquo;.
+LaTeX&#8221;.
<p/><p>This question on the Web: <a href="http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=dolldoll">http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=dolldoll</a>
</body>