diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Build/source/libs/pixman/pixman-0.30.0/README')
-rw-r--r-- | Build/source/libs/pixman/pixman-0.30.0/README | 116 |
1 files changed, 116 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Build/source/libs/pixman/pixman-0.30.0/README b/Build/source/libs/pixman/pixman-0.30.0/README new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6d8cfd8ad50 --- /dev/null +++ b/Build/source/libs/pixman/pixman-0.30.0/README @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@ +Pixman is a library that provides low-level pixel manipulation +features such as image compositing and trapezoid rasterization. + +Questions, bug reports and patches should be directed to the pixman +mailing list: + + http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pixman + +You can also file bugs at + + https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=pixman + +For real time discussions about pixman, feel free to join the IRC +channels #cairo and #xorg-devel on the FreeNode IRC network. + + +Contributing +------------ + +In order to contribute to pixman, you will need a working knowledge of +the git version control system. For a quick getting started guide, +there is the "Everyday Git With 20 Commands Or So guide" + + http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/everyday.html + +from the Git homepage. For more in depth git documentation, see the +resources on the Git community documentation page: + + http://git-scm.com/documentation + +Pixman uses the infrastructure from the freedesktop.org umbrella +project. For instructions about how to use the git service on +freedesktop.org, see: + + http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Infrastructure/git/Developers + +The Pixman master repository can be found at: + + git://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/pixman + +and browsed on the web here: + + http://cgit.freedesktop.org/pixman/ + + +Sending patches +--------------- + +The general workflow for sending patches is to first make sure that +git can send mail on your system. Then, + + - create a branch off of master in your local git repository + + - make your changes as one or more commits + + - use the + + git send-email + + command to send the patch series to pixman@lists.freedesktop.org. + +In order for your patches to be accepted, please consider the +following guidelines: + + - This link: + + http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/user-manual.html#patch-series + + describes how what a good patch series is, and to create one with + git. + + - At each point in the series, pixman should compile and the test + suite should pass. + + The exception here is if you are changing the test suite to + demonstrate a bug. In this case, make one commit that makes the + test suite fail due to the bug, and then another commit that fixes + the bug. + + You can run the test suite with + + make check + + It will take around two minutes to run on a modern PC. + + - Follow the coding style described in the CODING_STYLE file + + - For bug fixes, include an update to the test suite to make sure + the bug doesn't reappear. + + - For new features, add tests of the feature to the test + suite. Also, add a program demonstrating the new feature to the + demos/ directory. + + - Write descriptive commit messages. Useful information to include: + - Benchmark results, before and after + - Description of the bug that was fixed + - Detailed rationale for any new API + - Alternative approaches that were rejected (and why they + don't work) + - If review comments were incorporated, a brief version + history describing what those changes were. + + - For big patch series, send an introductory email with an overall + description of the patch series, including benchmarks and + motivation. Each commit message should still be descriptive and + include enough information to understand why this particular commit + was necessary. + +Pixman has high standards for code quality and so almost everybody +should expect to have the first versions of their patches rejected. + +If you think that the reviewers are wrong about something, or that the +guidelines above are wrong, feel free to discuss the issue on the +list. The purpose of the guidelines and code review is to ensure high +code quality; it is not an exercise in compliance. |