summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Master/texmf-dist/doc/bibtex/bestpapers/typography.bib
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKarl Berry <karl@freefriends.org>2015-10-25 22:35:35 +0000
committerKarl Berry <karl@freefriends.org>2015-10-25 22:35:35 +0000
commitc4586dcabf84bccd9caaff8f5b8dcb7cffe324a2 (patch)
treeb13405f5685314a93c96e4d3019c35b72ca3bca1 /Master/texmf-dist/doc/bibtex/bestpapers/typography.bib
parent814ed990b7031e0cf517b32095b9a9f0a52ad0a8 (diff)
bestpapers (25oct15)
git-svn-id: svn://tug.org/texlive/trunk@38708 c570f23f-e606-0410-a88d-b1316a301751
Diffstat (limited to 'Master/texmf-dist/doc/bibtex/bestpapers/typography.bib')
-rw-r--r--Master/texmf-dist/doc/bibtex/bestpapers/typography.bib214
1 files changed, 214 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/bibtex/bestpapers/typography.bib b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/bibtex/bestpapers/typography.bib
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..a96304cfdf8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/bibtex/bestpapers/typography.bib
@@ -0,0 +1,214 @@
+@Book{Tufte03:PowerPoint,
+ author = {Edward R. Tufte},
+ title = {The Cognitive Style of {Power Point}},
+ publisher = {Graphics Press LLC},
+ year = 2003,
+ address = {Cheshire, CT},
+ score = 10
+}
+
+
+@Book{Gill:Typography,
+ author = {Eric Gill},
+ title = {An Essay on Typography. With a new
+ introduction by Cristopher Skelton},
+ publisher = {David R. Godine},
+ year = 2007,
+ address = {Boston},
+ score = 12
+}
+
+
+@Article{Brumberger03a,
+ author = {Brumberger, Eva R.},
+ title = {The Rhetoric of Typography: The Persona of Typeface and
+ Text},
+ journal = {Technical Communication},
+ year = 2003,
+ volume = 50,
+ number = 2,
+ pages = {206--223},
+ score = 12,
+ annote = {Practitioners typically agree that typefaces have
+personas, and they often suggest specific personas for specific
+typefaces, but these guidelines rely on craftlore rather than on
+empirical evidence. Research on typography has focused primarily on
+readability and legibility issues; there have been few studies
+investigating the personas of typefaces. There is a clear gap in the
+research. With the increased flexibility in design that comes with
+more sophisticated desktop publishing technology, with an ongoing
+shift from printed to electronic documents, and with a growing
+emphasis on visual communication, this gap is becoming increasingly
+important to the field of technical communication. The studies
+discussed here provide strong empirical support for the notion that
+readers ascribe personality attributes both to typefaces and to text
+passages. The data provide a foundation for investigation of the
+interactions between typeface and text persona.} }
+
+
+@Article{Brumberger03b,
+ author = {Brumberger, Eva R.},
+ title = {The Rhetoric of Typography: The Awareness and
+ Impact of Typeface Appropriateness},
+ journal = {Technical Communication},
+ year = 2003,
+ volume = 50,
+ number = 2,
+ pages = {224--231},
+ score = 8,
+ annote = {Technical communicators have an emerging body of research
+ in visual rhetoric on which to build our practice, but little of
+ that work has focused on the rhetorical role of typography. The
+ majority of studies focused on typography have examined instead its
+ role in readability and legibility. A handful of studies have
+ investigated typeface persona, exploring the notion that typefaces
+ carry with them a message distinct from that of the verbal text that
+ they represent, and an additional few have investigated the issue of
+ typeface suitability. The studies presented here extend this
+ discussion by investigating whether clashes in typeface and text
+ persona affect readers\u2019 perceptions of the text.} }
+
+
+
+@Article{Brumberger04,
+ author = {Brumberger, Eva},
+ title = {The Rhetoric of Typography: Effects on Reading
+ Time, Reading Comprehension, and Perceptions of
+ Ethos},
+ journal = {Technical Communication},
+ year = 2004,
+ volume = 51,
+ number = 1,
+ pages = {13--24},
+ score = 9,
+ annote = {Asserts that typography has not occupied a
+ significant role in discussions of visual rhetoric.
+ Extends those discussions by investigating whether
+ typeface persona shapes readers' interactions with a
+ document.}
+}
+
+@Book{Bartram04,
+ author = {Alan Bartram},
+ title = {Bauhaus, Modernism and the Illustrated Book},
+ publisher = {Yale University Press},
+ year = 2004,
+ address = {New Haven, CT},
+ score = 14,
+}
+
+@Book{Tschichold91:FormBook,
+ author = {Jan Tschichold},
+ editor = {Robert Bringhurst},
+ title = {The Form of the Book.
+ Essays on the Morality of Good Design},
+ publisher = {Hartley \& Marks},
+ year = 1991,
+ address = {Point Roberts, Washington},
+ score = 25
+}
+
+
+
+@book{bringhurst2004elements,
+ title={The Elements of Typographic Style},
+ author={Bringhurst, Robert},
+ isbn={9780881792065},
+ lccn={2004053913},
+ year={2004},
+ publisher={Hartley \& Marks, Publishers},
+ address = {Vancouver, BC, Canada},
+ score = 22,
+}
+
+
+@Book{Tschichold98:NewTypography,
+ author = {Jan Tschichold},
+ title = {The New Typography},
+ publisher = {University of California Press},
+ year = 1998,
+ address = {Berkeley and Los Angelos, CA},
+ score = 24,
+}
+
+@Article{Legge11,
+ author = {Gordon E. Legge and Charles A. Bigelow},
+ title = {Does Print Size Matter for Reading?
+ {A} Review of Findings
+ from Vision Science and Typography},
+ journal = {J. Vision},
+ year = 2011,
+ volume = {11(5)},
+ number = 8,
+ pages = {1--22},
+ score = 23,
+ annote = {The size and shape of printed symbols determine the
+legibility of text. In this paper, we focus on print size because of
+its crucial role in understanding reading performance and its
+significance in the history and contemporary practice of
+typography. We present evidence supporting the hypothesis that the
+distribution of print sizes in historical and contemporary
+publications falls within the psychophysically defined range of fluent
+print sizeVthe range over which text can be read at maximum speed. The
+fluent range extends over a factor of 10 in angular print size
+(x-height) from approximately 0.2- to 2-. Assuming a standard reading
+distance of 40 cm (16 inches), the corresponding physical x-heights
+are 1.4 mm (4 points) and 14 mm (40 points). We provide new data on
+the distributions of print sizes in published books and newspapers and
+in typefounders' specimens, and consider factors influencing these
+distributions. We discuss theoretical concepts from vision science
+concerning visual size coding that help inform our understanding of
+historical and modern typographical practices. While economic,
+social, technological, and artistic factors influence type design and
+selection, we conclude that properties of human visual processing play
+a dominant role in constraining the distribution of print sizes in
+common use. } }
+
+@Book{Spiekermann02,
+ author = {Erik Spiekermann and E. M. Ginger},
+ title = {Stop Stealing Sheep \& Find Out How Type Works},
+ publisher = {Adobe Press},
+ year = 2002,
+ address = {Berkeley, CA},
+ edition = {Second},
+ score = 16,
+ ISBN = {978-0201703399}
+}
+
+@InProceedings{Morris02,
+ author = {Morris, R. A. and Aquilante, K. and Yager, D. and
+ Bigelow, C.},
+ title = {Serifs Slow {RSVP} Reading At Very Small Sizes But Don't
+ Matter At Larger Sizes},
+ booktitle = {SID 2002, San Jose, CA: Digest of Technical Papers},
+ pages = {244--247},
+ year = 2002,
+ score = 19,
+ organization = {The Society for Information Display},
+ annote = {Morris, Aquilante, Yager and Bigelow (2002) did find an
+effect of serifs on reading speed, unlike Arditi and Cho. These
+investigators used specially designed versions of the Lucida typeface
+family (Bigelow and Holmes Inc., San Jose, CA), one with serifs and
+one without serifs. Although typical serif and sans-serif fonts differ
+in a variety of attributes, the specially designed Lucida fonts were
+almost identical, apart from the presence or absence of
+serifs. According to Morris et al: "the designers produced a seriffed
+and sans-serif pair whose underlying forms are identical in stem
+weights, character widths, character spacing and fitting, and
+modulation of thick to thin. The only difference is the presence or
+absence of serifs, and the slight increase of black area in the
+seriffed variant." The investigators used the rapid serial visual
+presentation (RSVP) method to measure reading speed for the two font
+variants. For a small print size of 12 min-arc (probably near the
+critical print size, Section 3.2), reading speed was about 20% faster
+for the sans-serif font, but there was no difference in reading speed
+at a larger print size of 48 min-arc} }
+
+@book{Jaspert:TypefacesEncyclopaedia,
+ title={The Encyclop\ae dia of Typefaces},
+ author={Jaspert, W. P. and Berry, W. T. and Johnson, A. F.},
+ year= 2009,
+ publisher={Cassell},
+ edition = {55th Anniversary},
+ address = {London}
+}