diff options
author | Karl Berry <karl@freefriends.org> | 2015-10-25 22:35:35 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Karl Berry <karl@freefriends.org> | 2015-10-25 22:35:35 +0000 |
commit | c4586dcabf84bccd9caaff8f5b8dcb7cffe324a2 (patch) | |
tree | b13405f5685314a93c96e4d3019c35b72ca3bca1 /Master/texmf-dist/doc/bibtex/bestpapers/typography.bib | |
parent | 814ed990b7031e0cf517b32095b9a9f0a52ad0a8 (diff) |
bestpapers (25oct15)
git-svn-id: svn://tug.org/texlive/trunk@38708 c570f23f-e606-0410-a88d-b1316a301751
Diffstat (limited to 'Master/texmf-dist/doc/bibtex/bestpapers/typography.bib')
-rw-r--r-- | Master/texmf-dist/doc/bibtex/bestpapers/typography.bib | 214 |
1 files changed, 214 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/bibtex/bestpapers/typography.bib b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/bibtex/bestpapers/typography.bib new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a96304cfdf8 --- /dev/null +++ b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/bibtex/bestpapers/typography.bib @@ -0,0 +1,214 @@ +@Book{Tufte03:PowerPoint, + author = {Edward R. Tufte}, + title = {The Cognitive Style of {Power Point}}, + publisher = {Graphics Press LLC}, + year = 2003, + address = {Cheshire, CT}, + score = 10 +} + + +@Book{Gill:Typography, + author = {Eric Gill}, + title = {An Essay on Typography. With a new + introduction by Cristopher Skelton}, + publisher = {David R. Godine}, + year = 2007, + address = {Boston}, + score = 12 +} + + +@Article{Brumberger03a, + author = {Brumberger, Eva R.}, + title = {The Rhetoric of Typography: The Persona of Typeface and + Text}, + journal = {Technical Communication}, + year = 2003, + volume = 50, + number = 2, + pages = {206--223}, + score = 12, + annote = {Practitioners typically agree that typefaces have +personas, and they often suggest specific personas for specific +typefaces, but these guidelines rely on craftlore rather than on +empirical evidence. Research on typography has focused primarily on +readability and legibility issues; there have been few studies +investigating the personas of typefaces. There is a clear gap in the +research. With the increased flexibility in design that comes with +more sophisticated desktop publishing technology, with an ongoing +shift from printed to electronic documents, and with a growing +emphasis on visual communication, this gap is becoming increasingly +important to the field of technical communication. The studies +discussed here provide strong empirical support for the notion that +readers ascribe personality attributes both to typefaces and to text +passages. The data provide a foundation for investigation of the +interactions between typeface and text persona.} } + + +@Article{Brumberger03b, + author = {Brumberger, Eva R.}, + title = {The Rhetoric of Typography: The Awareness and + Impact of Typeface Appropriateness}, + journal = {Technical Communication}, + year = 2003, + volume = 50, + number = 2, + pages = {224--231}, + score = 8, + annote = {Technical communicators have an emerging body of research + in visual rhetoric on which to build our practice, but little of + that work has focused on the rhetorical role of typography. The + majority of studies focused on typography have examined instead its + role in readability and legibility. A handful of studies have + investigated typeface persona, exploring the notion that typefaces + carry with them a message distinct from that of the verbal text that + they represent, and an additional few have investigated the issue of + typeface suitability. The studies presented here extend this + discussion by investigating whether clashes in typeface and text + persona affect readers\u2019 perceptions of the text.} } + + + +@Article{Brumberger04, + author = {Brumberger, Eva}, + title = {The Rhetoric of Typography: Effects on Reading + Time, Reading Comprehension, and Perceptions of + Ethos}, + journal = {Technical Communication}, + year = 2004, + volume = 51, + number = 1, + pages = {13--24}, + score = 9, + annote = {Asserts that typography has not occupied a + significant role in discussions of visual rhetoric. + Extends those discussions by investigating whether + typeface persona shapes readers' interactions with a + document.} +} + +@Book{Bartram04, + author = {Alan Bartram}, + title = {Bauhaus, Modernism and the Illustrated Book}, + publisher = {Yale University Press}, + year = 2004, + address = {New Haven, CT}, + score = 14, +} + +@Book{Tschichold91:FormBook, + author = {Jan Tschichold}, + editor = {Robert Bringhurst}, + title = {The Form of the Book. + Essays on the Morality of Good Design}, + publisher = {Hartley \& Marks}, + year = 1991, + address = {Point Roberts, Washington}, + score = 25 +} + + + +@book{bringhurst2004elements, + title={The Elements of Typographic Style}, + author={Bringhurst, Robert}, + isbn={9780881792065}, + lccn={2004053913}, + year={2004}, + publisher={Hartley \& Marks, Publishers}, + address = {Vancouver, BC, Canada}, + score = 22, +} + + +@Book{Tschichold98:NewTypography, + author = {Jan Tschichold}, + title = {The New Typography}, + publisher = {University of California Press}, + year = 1998, + address = {Berkeley and Los Angelos, CA}, + score = 24, +} + +@Article{Legge11, + author = {Gordon E. Legge and Charles A. Bigelow}, + title = {Does Print Size Matter for Reading? + {A} Review of Findings + from Vision Science and Typography}, + journal = {J. Vision}, + year = 2011, + volume = {11(5)}, + number = 8, + pages = {1--22}, + score = 23, + annote = {The size and shape of printed symbols determine the +legibility of text. In this paper, we focus on print size because of +its crucial role in understanding reading performance and its +significance in the history and contemporary practice of +typography. We present evidence supporting the hypothesis that the +distribution of print sizes in historical and contemporary +publications falls within the psychophysically defined range of fluent +print sizeVthe range over which text can be read at maximum speed. The +fluent range extends over a factor of 10 in angular print size +(x-height) from approximately 0.2- to 2-. Assuming a standard reading +distance of 40 cm (16 inches), the corresponding physical x-heights +are 1.4 mm (4 points) and 14 mm (40 points). We provide new data on +the distributions of print sizes in published books and newspapers and +in typefounders' specimens, and consider factors influencing these +distributions. We discuss theoretical concepts from vision science +concerning visual size coding that help inform our understanding of +historical and modern typographical practices. While economic, +social, technological, and artistic factors influence type design and +selection, we conclude that properties of human visual processing play +a dominant role in constraining the distribution of print sizes in +common use. } } + +@Book{Spiekermann02, + author = {Erik Spiekermann and E. M. Ginger}, + title = {Stop Stealing Sheep \& Find Out How Type Works}, + publisher = {Adobe Press}, + year = 2002, + address = {Berkeley, CA}, + edition = {Second}, + score = 16, + ISBN = {978-0201703399} +} + +@InProceedings{Morris02, + author = {Morris, R. A. and Aquilante, K. and Yager, D. and + Bigelow, C.}, + title = {Serifs Slow {RSVP} Reading At Very Small Sizes But Don't + Matter At Larger Sizes}, + booktitle = {SID 2002, San Jose, CA: Digest of Technical Papers}, + pages = {244--247}, + year = 2002, + score = 19, + organization = {The Society for Information Display}, + annote = {Morris, Aquilante, Yager and Bigelow (2002) did find an +effect of serifs on reading speed, unlike Arditi and Cho. These +investigators used specially designed versions of the Lucida typeface +family (Bigelow and Holmes Inc., San Jose, CA), one with serifs and +one without serifs. Although typical serif and sans-serif fonts differ +in a variety of attributes, the specially designed Lucida fonts were +almost identical, apart from the presence or absence of +serifs. According to Morris et al: "the designers produced a seriffed +and sans-serif pair whose underlying forms are identical in stem +weights, character widths, character spacing and fitting, and +modulation of thick to thin. The only difference is the presence or +absence of serifs, and the slight increase of black area in the +seriffed variant." The investigators used the rapid serial visual +presentation (RSVP) method to measure reading speed for the two font +variants. For a small print size of 12 min-arc (probably near the +critical print size, Section 3.2), reading speed was about 20% faster +for the sans-serif font, but there was no difference in reading speed +at a larger print size of 48 min-arc} } + +@book{Jaspert:TypefacesEncyclopaedia, + title={The Encyclop\ae dia of Typefaces}, + author={Jaspert, W. P. and Berry, W. T. and Johnson, A. F.}, + year= 2009, + publisher={Cassell}, + edition = {55th Anniversary}, + address = {London} +} |