summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/support/texlab/src/snapshots/texlab__citation__tests__biblatex_examples_015.snap
blob: 4d787a627a5d3b9e2f2715418c5a015c6b749885 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
---
source: src/citation.rs
assertion_line: 490
expression: "render_simple(r#\"\n@article{sigfridsson,\n    author       = {Sigfridsson, Emma and Ryde, Ulf},\n    title        = {Comparison of methods for deriving atomic charges from the\n                    electrostatic potential and moments},\n    journaltitle = {Journal of Computational Chemistry},\n    date         = 1998,\n    volume       = 19,\n    number       = 4,\n    pages        = {377-395},\n    doi          = {10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199803)19:4<377::AID-JCC1>3.0.CO;2-P},\n    langid       = {english},\n    langidopts   = {variant=american},\n    indextitle   = {Methods for deriving atomic charges},\n    annotation   = {An \\texttt{article} entry with \\texttt{volume},\n                    \\texttt{number}, and \\texttt{doi} fields. Note that the\n                    \\textsc{doi} is transformed into a clickable link if\n                    \\texttt{hyperref} support has been enabled},\n    abstract     = {Four methods for deriving partial atomic charges from the\n                    quantum chemical electrostatic potential (CHELP, CHELPG,\n                    Merz-Kollman, and RESP) have been compared and critically\n                    evaluated. It is shown that charges strongly depend on how and\n                    where the potential points are selected. Two alternative\n                    methods are suggested to avoid the arbitrariness in the\n                    point-selection schemes and van der Waals exclusion radii:\n                    CHELP-BOW, which also estimates the charges from the\n                    electrostatic potential, but with potential points that are\n                    Boltzmann-weighted after their occurrence in actual\n                    simulations using the energy function of the program in which\n                    the charges will be used, and CHELMO, which estimates the\n                    charges directly from the electrostatic multipole\n                    moments. Different criteria for the quality of the charges are\n                    discussed.},\n}\"#)"
---
Sigfridsson, Emma, & Ryde, Ulf. (n.d.). Comparison of methods for deriving atomic charges from the electrostatic potential and moments. *Journal of Computational Chemistry*, *19*(4), 377–395. [https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199803)19:4%3C377::AID-JCC1%3E3.0.CO;2-P](https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199803)19:4%3C377::AID-JCC1%3E3.0.CO;2-P)