From 010a3454a27ee40902d7764080eb7eb7ddcaa700 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Norbert Preining Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 03:01:52 +0000 Subject: CTAN sync 201910100301 --- fonts/stickstoo/doc/stickstoo-doc.pdf | Bin 490123 -> 564425 bytes fonts/stickstoo/doc/stickstoo-doc.tex | 20 ++++++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'fonts/stickstoo/doc') diff --git a/fonts/stickstoo/doc/stickstoo-doc.pdf b/fonts/stickstoo/doc/stickstoo-doc.pdf index 17762ee758..77781a6242 100644 Binary files a/fonts/stickstoo/doc/stickstoo-doc.pdf and b/fonts/stickstoo/doc/stickstoo-doc.pdf differ diff --git a/fonts/stickstoo/doc/stickstoo-doc.tex b/fonts/stickstoo/doc/stickstoo-doc.tex index 1288481164..276a9980b4 100644 --- a/fonts/stickstoo/doc/stickstoo-doc.tex +++ b/fonts/stickstoo/doc/stickstoo-doc.tex @@ -5,10 +5,10 @@ \usepackage[parfill]{parskip}% Begin paragraphs with an empty line rather than an indent %\pdfmapfile{+SticksTooText.map} \pdfmapfile{=newtx.map} -\usepackage{graphicx} +\usepackage[a-1b]{pdfx} %\usepackage{amssymb}% don't use with newtxmath %SetFonts -% libertine+newtxmath +% stickstoo+newtxmath \usepackage{stickstootext} % use sb in place of bold \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage{textcomp} @@ -100,6 +100,22 @@ For example, \verb|\vmathbb{A\imath z\dots\jmath\alpha| renders as $\vmathbb{A\i Option {\tt varbb} causes \verb|\mathbb| to be let equal to \verb|\varmathbb|, effectively {\tt DSSerif}, and option {\tt vvarbb} causes \verb|\mathbb| to be let equal to \verb|\vvmathbb|, effectively STIX blackboard bold. +\section{PDF/A Compliance} +This pdf document was generated with + +was tested for compliance with {\tt PDFA-1b} a preamble containing the line +\begin{verbatim} +\usepackage[a-1b]{pdfx} +\end{verbatim} +It was tested for compliance with that standard using three different methods, with varying results, as is common. +\begin{itemize} +\item +\textsf{Adobe Acrobat Pro DC} says it does comply with PDF/A-1b. +\item The test site \url{https://www.pdf-online.com/osa/validate.aspx} affirms that also. +\item The free test package \textsf{veraPDF} says that it does not, and shows a number of issues about widths of glyphs and non-existence of some used glyphs. I found this report unconvincing, as when I merely removed the hints from the type 1 fonts, it gave me the same errors, but relating to a different set of glyphs. A message from its developers said that the type 1 fonts would fail the conformance test if their disassembled code contained a subroutine call before the width specification {\tt hsbw}, and that is common for type 1 fonts constructed using {\tt cfftot1} from the well known \textsf{LCDF Type Tools}. When I changed to using \textsf{FontForge} to construct the type 1 fonts, \textsf{veraPDF} gave a different set of problem glyphs, not overlapping the previous set. Finally, I removed all hints and received yet another set of problem glyphs. +\end{itemize}• + + \section{Some math samples} The following snippets mostly originated with the \TeX Book\ and were adapted for \LaTeX\ from Karl Berry's torture test for plain tex math fonts. -- cgit v1.2.3